Years ago, there was an interview with Simon Evans, an arty British skateboarder with classic 411-era ballerina arms living in San Francisco, that brought up the relationship between art and skateboarding. Evans, an accomplished artist in his own right, claimed that skateboarding was merely an extension of art making. Perhaps a year later, in an interview with Big Brother, Geoff Rowley denied the claim.
This issue is not at all limited to British-born skateboarders. For people like me, who spend a great deal of time thinking about both, the relationship between art and skateboarding remains elusively obstinate. Nevertheless, I’ve come up with my own answer: Skateboarding can be arty, but it can’t be art.
Put bluntly: skateboarding is not art. Let me explain why I used to think it was, but now know that it isn’t.
I was, like a lot of ancient codgers that are pushing 40 now, one of those weirdos who started skateboarding because I didn’t fit into any other clique/sport/subculture. It was the late ‘80s and skateboarding was pretty loud, graphic, and, for lack of a better word, arty. Thrasher had Pushead, TWS was full of stoned San Diego college kid musings, and the triumvirate of skateboarders that everyone admired — Blender, Gonz, and Natas — were all, legitimately, arty innovators.
But that is not to say that they were artists. It was just that everything was a lot more arty back then.
Around 1987, vert skating was kind of winding down, and street skating’s rules were not yet entrenched. There certainly was a more creative vibe to the activity that manifested not only in the tricks, which were either bionic recapitulations of vert tricks on stationary obstacles (curbs, planters, benches, etc.) or stairs, gaps, and launch ramps.
In other words, you could either skate a bench like a quarterpipe that you ollied up to, do boardslides and slappies on curbs, or go big off stairs and launch ramps, but the three weren’t combined (technical finesse, power, and speed) until the early ‘90s when modern street skating was born. I would argue that this occurs with some Mack Dawg productions such as Sick Boys and early H-Street videos.
Graphically, skateboarding was coming out of the mid-’80s inspired repeating pattern aesthetic (think Vision Gator boards or the medieval manuscript/Albrecht Durer/Chinese meander pattern of Powell VCJ graphics) towards a more hand-drawn aesthetic first pioneered by Neil Blender and Mark Gonzales.
This introduced the notion that skateboarders could be artists, but we have to be very careful here. Skateboarders can do graphics, some can even make art, but skateboarding itself is not an art. I define art as a language that functions on a purely symbolic level. Art is not a tool, like the skateboard.
Skateboarders can do graphics, some can even make art, but skateboarding itself is not an art.
Defined by Raphael Zarka, skateboarding is a ludic, playful activity that is an extended form of play. The skateboard, in many ways a toy, playfully critiques architectural space, but that isn’t the whole point. It is a tool, but not a symbol.
In other words, the thing that separates us from, say, primates, is that we make tools out of things, and we shape the world through our crafts to better suit our needs. It is a short step from making arrowheads, which are an improvement upon the flint rock as a weapon/knife/utensil, and a figurine out of a rock, which may symbolize sexual fertility, abundance, etc. It is the unique ability of humans to see the potential of a rock to embody an image of something else. We do this all the time when we look up at the clouds and imagine something else. Artists do this through making art.
Skateboarding, though it does rely on that way of looking at the world — seeing the potential for a backside noseblunt in a bench that most people would merely see as a seat — shares that human quality that is linked to making art. However, what we do is performative, and if it can be considered a language at all, it is a language that is spoken for and amongst ourselves.
Whereas other art is designed to communicate to the outside world, skateboarding is actually inward-looking. And what we say as skateboarders when we’re skateboarding is significantly less important than what we do as skateboarders. That’s the key difference.
Artists may communicate with one another, paying attention to things that wouldn’t be picked up on by a lay audience, but they are still making something that goes out into the world and is supposed to be seen, understood, and consumed by a wide audience.
Skateboarding doesn’t do that. The outside world isn’t supposed to get it. If you’ve ever been frustrated by seeing a New York Times photographer, for example, completely miss the shot when doing a story about skateboarders, or how mind-blowingly pointless 99% of what is written about skateboarding is when it’s not written for and by skateboarders, you’ll see what I’m talking about.
While we may have a coded and well-protected language that we speak, that language isn’t the point. The act of skateboarding is the point. And this point is often so strong, so compelling, that it somewhat blinds us to the fact that, as skateboarders, we may not be able to pull everything off with the same aplomb that we do our frontside flips.
Skaters-turned–actors, photographers, DJ’s, painters, etc. often, with few exceptions, stand to learn a lot in the other department. The transition from skater to carpenter is never as clean as sponsors may want to make it seem and requires a different set of skills that skateboarding may possibly have prepared them for, but doesn’t necessarily make them capable creators in any other medium.
Knowing that skateboarding isn’t art makes it more enjoyable. From my experience, art is something that you return to, re-read, look at for hours, move through or around, immerse yourself in. It is about slow, contemplative immersion, whose meaning becomes clearer, though never totally defined, over time.
Skateboarding, on the other hand, is about the immediacy of the moment. Wanting to extract some larger sentimental, cultural, or political significance from the act of skateboarding often leads to a lot of hot air (see above) or a dead end. Over-thinking the thing drains it of the joy of doing it.
Art is designed to be over-thought, skateboarding works best when under-thought. Clearly I’m not skateboarding right now, that’s why I’m thinking. I should go skateboarding. So should you.
Related Posts
Comments
Popular
-
REIMAGINING THE SKATE VIDEO, A TALK ON MIKE TERNASKY AT MUSEUM OF THE MOVING IMAGE
How the filmmaker and co-founder of Plan B had an impact on how we view skateboard videos today.
-
PREMIERE: STEVEN CUSTOZZO AND MICHAEL FALLER IN “HEIRLOOM”
Unconventional tricks at classic NYC spots.
-
A CHAT WITH LUDVIG HAKANSSON, THE OLDEST SOUL IN SKATEBOARDING
The man loves to read Nietzche, skates in some expensive vintage gear, and paints in his own neoclassical-meets-abstract-expressionist style.
-
SKATING THE WRECKAGE OF HURRICANE MILTON
A Florida crew keeps a smile as they skate the aftermath of a brutal hurricane season.
-
ETHAN LOY’S CANDID TAKE ON THE SKATE INDUSTRY, FAMILY AND HIS CAREER REBIRTH
"Skating is bullshit compared to what I’ve been through."
January 7, 2019 5:30 pm
Why can’t people just think for themselves? I for one appreciate this article. I can be moved by skateboarding that is traditionally seen as ‘arty’ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YnsAlzd-PY) but I’m still going to watch and enjoy the latest lil schmatty part. Skateboarding is whatever you want it to be.
January 7, 2019 8:29 pm
My main problem here is you say skate boarding is a tool and that’s supposed to feed into how it’s not art, but since an artist uses a tool to create (i.e. brush, camera, etc), I fail to see how that fuels your argument.
January 7, 2019 10:02 pm
I love articles like this! I have a lot of thoughts and opinions that go in different directions here. Brian Eno defines art as anything you don’t have to do (there’s a TED talk on this). In this talk he uses a screwdriver as an example of something that runs the gamut of tool on one end, the head of the screw driver, to art on the other. The screwdriver head has to be what it is, and it cannot be anything else. The options for presentation gradually increase until you get to the handle end of the screwdriver, which can be as decorative as you like.
This is only one person’s definition of art, but it’s one I like to keep in mind. My personal definition of art is an authentic expression of one’s real self. Nobody argues that ballet, dance, and music are not art, though it’s harder to make a concise statement with an abstract outlet. Skateboarding can be art, but it doesn’t have to be. Skateboarding can be social commentary. It can be play, it can be a kung-fu, it can be a sport. It can be any of these things, and it doesn’t have to be.
January 7, 2019 10:14 pm
Ironically, ted barrow uses his background as a self proclaimed art historian to critique skatepark clips. A skateboard has potential as a tool to create. Depends how one uses it. For example, a skateboarder who films video parts. The skateboard is being used as a tool to create a video part that can be viewed over and over much like a paint brush that paints a canvas. Both can be viewed, critiqued and symbolize something to the creator and viewer. Ted sounds like a skateboarder who lacks skill and also an art historian who doesn’t create art.